<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Testing web fonts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.movito.net/testing-web-fonts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.movito.net/testing-web-fonts/</link>
	<description>Mostly on interaction design and tools for collaboration</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 12:36:07 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter Bilak</title>
		<link>http://www.movito.net/testing-web-fonts/comment-page-1/#comment-749</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Bilak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 10:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.movito.net/?p=384#comment-749</guid>
		<description>Hi Fredrik, thanks for trying out our service. Though, we have been testing it for months, it is only the real use that will help us to improve and grow. If you prefer communicating via our support site, we use &lt;a href=&quot;http://typotheque-web-font-system.tenderapp.com/home&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Tender&lt;/a&gt;. But because we are just two people, email is the best way.

I hope you understand that WOFF is a font format that as it will became more accepted more foundries will support. Typotheque has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.typotheque.com/news/typotheque_endorses_new_font_format_woff&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;endorsed WOFF&lt;/a&gt; from the beginning, and will include it in our service. At the moment it makes little sense, as most browsers understand only OTF/TTF or EOT fonts.

And finally, the difference between other services and Typotheque is that we are a type foundry, so we are more interested in actual typefaces more than the delivery method. We can work with any method / format that will be prove useful. But our focus will be on original new fonts.

In any case thanks for the feedback!

Peter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Fredrik, thanks for trying out our service. Though, we have been testing it for months, it is only the real use that will help us to improve and grow. If you prefer communicating via our support site, we use <a href="http://typotheque-web-font-system.tenderapp.com/home" rel="nofollow">Tender</a>. But because we are just two people, email is the best way.</p>
<p>I hope you understand that WOFF is a font format that as it will became more accepted more foundries will support. Typotheque has <a href="http://www.typotheque.com/news/typotheque_endorses_new_font_format_woff" rel="nofollow">endorsed WOFF</a> from the beginning, and will include it in our service. At the moment it makes little sense, as most browsers understand only OTF/TTF or EOT fonts.</p>
<p>And finally, the difference between other services and Typotheque is that we are a type foundry, so we are more interested in actual typefaces more than the delivery method. We can work with any method / format that will be prove useful. But our focus will be on original new fonts.</p>
<p>In any case thanks for the feedback!</p>
<p>Peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
